European Union Language

[Wasicu]

The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby
English will be the official language of the European Union rather than
German, which was the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that
English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted
a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make
the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour
of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one
less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the
troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like
fotograf 20% shorter.
 
In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted
to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.

Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have
always ben a deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is
disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing
"th" with "z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining
"ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensi bl riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand
ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze
forst plas.

[110annidistoria]

Fantastico

Inviato dal mio GT-S7500 con Tapatalk 2

[Frusta]

“Tu credi, immagino, che il nostro compito principale consista nell’inventare nuove parole. Neanche per idea! Noi le parole le distruggiamo, a dozzine, a centinaia. Giorno per giorno, stiamo riducendo il linguaggio all’osso. [...] Che bisogno c’è di una parola che è solo l’opposto di un’altra? Ogni parola già contiene in se stessa il suo opposto. Prendiamo “buono”, per esempio. Se hai a disposizione una parola come “buono”, che bisogno c’è di avere anche “cattivo”? “Sbuono” andrà altrettanto bene, anzi meglio, perché, a differenza dell’altra, costituisce l’opposto esatto di “buono”. [...] Non è una cosa meravigliosa?»
George Orwell, “1984″ – La Neolingua

[BobLovati]

visto che ancora non c´è, ci penso io ad inserire un dovuto


´STIKAZZI ?? ?? ?? ??